Saturday, December 31, 2011
Eve of the Name of Jesus: "He took the curse of the law upon himself."

What does Christ do when He, though Lord of the Law, freely subjects Himself to circumcision? Paul says in galatians 5:3: “I testify to you that every one who allows himself to be circumcised is obliged to keep the whole law” [Luther Bibel]. Accordingly, the circumcision of Christ has the important significance for us that He thereby subjected Himself to the judgment of the Law. That means He took the curse of the Law upon Himself. He fulfilled for us the entire Law in the most perfect obedience of love. For us He received the wages of sin. He received our death and curse along with all distress and misery, which the Law casts upon the sinner and transgressor for time and eternity.
These drops of blood that the dear child Jesus sheds here at His circumcision are, as it
were, the earnest money, the down payment, which our guarantor lays down against the
judgment of god. Through it He pledges to pay the entire debt. As a real guarantor, He
pledges to accomplish all this for us so that a thorough peace between us and god and His
Law be established.
This was completed on the cross by His death. His life was a sin offering given for the
sins of the lost children of Adam. His precious blood paid the full ransom and purchased
us back from the curse of the Law. The Law can now no longer threaten you [with the
phrase]: “Perfect obedience or death!” So you are redeemed from sin, death, and devil. The
righteousness of god is absolutely fulfilled. He is now a reconciled Father, who, for the
sake of Christ, forgives us our sins, receives us again as His children, and will give to us life
and salvation. to this end, through the Holy Spirit, He grants repentance in faith that we
become righteous and holy before god.
Do you see what Christ’s circumcision means! You have to admit it is of the highest
importance and blessing for a lost sinner. Here the fearful yoke and the unbearable weight
of the Law, with its unfulfillable demands and awful curses, was taken from your shoulders
and laid upon this beloved little child. With great pains, the down payment for you was
made with His drops of blood. He pledged Himself to pay your entire, great, horrible
guilt. He freely relieved you of this burden. Moreover, through this guarantor and this
deed, He obtained forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation.
Now what is the significance of the name Jesus for us? The angel who appeared to her
already proclaimed to Mary that she should call the newborn child “Jesus.” Later an angel
also appeared to Joseph in a dream. He commanded him to take Mary as his wife and to
call the little child to be born, conceived of the Holy Spirit, “Jesus,” for He would save
His people from their sins. At the circumcision, Christ began the work of redemption and
salvation. Here this name was publicly given Him.
Friedrich Wyneken, A Sermon of Consolation on New Year's Eve
At Home in the House of My Fathers, CPH 2011
Friday, December 30, 2011
The House Where Luther Used To Die.

Thursday, December 29, 2011
Photos of Obscure German Places - Langenchursdorf: Home of CFW Walther


More from the Wartburg Castle
St. Paul's in Leipzig Rebuilt
A Leipziger recently told me that the destruction of St. Paul's Church in 1968 by the DDR government was the darkest day in the history of the city. A high ranking communist official noticed rather heavy student traffic and inquired about it. The students were attending church at St. Paul's. Thus the ancient church was destroyed to make room for "improvements" at the university (another communist box-monstrosity). Thousands protested and were incarcerated, some spending years in prison. The church where Bach performed, Luther and Harless preached and so much more happened, has now been rebuilt. I took the bottom photo a few weeks ago. 
The church survived the war practically unscathed but was dynamited in 1968 during the communist regime ofEast Germany. It was not rebuilt. Instead, a new university church was built on the site in the shape of the former church and inaugurated in 2009, for the 600th anniversary of the university. For the full Wiki story click HERE.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011
Monday, December 26, 2011
Finally a little time for car repair
Pastor H
Sunday, December 25, 2011
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
The Decisive Battle of the Smalcald War

The Smalcald War, so called because it was directed against the Smalcald League, was easily won by the Emperor. Among the causes of this unfortunate issue were the neutral attitude of Joachim II of Brandenburg and of other Lutheran princes, and especially the treachery of the ambitious and unscrupulous Maurice, Duke of Saxony and nephew of Elector John Frederick of Saxony, who, in order to gain the Electorate of Saxony, had made a secret agreement with the Emperor according to which he was to join his forces with those of the Emperor against the Lutherans. The decisive battle was fought at Muehlberg on the Elbe,April 24, 1547. It proved to be a crushing defeat for the Protestants.The Elector himself was taken captive, treated as a rebel, and sentenced to death. The sentence was read to him while he was playing chess with his fellow-captive, Duke Ernest of Lueneburg. John Frederick answered, he did not believe that the Emperor would deal so severely with him; if, however, he were in earnest, they should let him know that he might order his affairs with his wife and children. He then calmly turned to the Duke, saying: "Let us continue the game; it's your move." (Jaekel, G. d. Ref. l, 114.) The day after the battle at Muehlberg, Torgau fell into the hands of the Emperor; and when he threatened to execute the Elector, having already erected a scaffold for this purpose,Wittenberg, too, though well protected by 5,000 soldiers, signed a capitulation on May 19, in order to save the Elector's life. On the 23d ofMay,Wittenberg was occupied by the Emperor.Here Charles, when standing at the grave of Luther, and urged to have the body of "the heretic" exhumed, spoke the memorable words that he was warring not with the dead, but with the living. The death-sentence was rescinded, but, apart from other cruel conditions forced upon the Elector, he was compelled to resign in favor of Maurice and promise to remain in captivity as long as the Emperor should desire. His sons were granted the districts of Weimar, Jena, Eisenach, and Gotha. Philip of Hesse surrendered without striking a blow, and was likewise treacherously held in captivity and humiliated in every possible way by the Emperor. The imperial plenipotentiaries had assured the Landgrave that he would not be imprisoned. Afterwards, however, the words in the document, "not any bodily captivity - nit eenige Leibesgefangenschaft," were fraudulently changed by Granvella to read, "not eternal captivity-nit ewige Leibesgefangenschaft" (Marheineke, G. d. Deut. Ref. 4, 438.) The sons of the Landgrave remained in possession of his territory. Thus all of Southern and, barring a few cities, also all of Northern Germany was conquered by Charles. Everywhere the Lutherans were at the tender mercy of the Emperor,whose undisputed power struck terror into all Germany.
Sasse: "A Single illness threatens the Lutheran Churches of the World."

The letters, which at Christmas time came from various areas of the Lutheran Church of Europe and America, from territorial and free churches, large and small churches, spoke without exception of the deep inner distress of the churches. They spoke of distressing matters scarcely found in the church papers, matters of which one can not speak publicly at all, or only in a very limited way. But all these voices give one who resides at a place on the earth outside Europe and America the impression that a single illness threatens the Lutheran Churches of the world. It is the very secularization of the church itself.
If 25 years ago the secularization of culture was recognized as the great illness of the time, then it is soberly to be asserted today that secularism is now the illness of the church. It is gripping to see that, in order to fulfill the missiological goal of calling the peoples of the west back to the Christian faith, the church itself must first be turned back to this faith. “Sweden’s people are God’ people.” That was the solution a generation ago. Today the question is to what extent the Church of Sweden is still the church of God? And so it is in all nations.

Great missionary endeavors and evangelization efforts will still be carried out, but it is precisely the most serious evangelists who are coming to the conviction that the gospel preaching church must be the first object of their evangelization. This understanding was already once given as a gift to German evangelical churchdom. The consequence of the theology of Karl Barth in the time of his great influence in the first half of the 1930’s was based upon this recognition. That was the meaning of his struggle against Otto Dibelius [1880-1967] and his “Century of the Church.” That was the most profound power of the “Confessing Churches” of all persuasions in Germany, however they may have differed from each other as Lutherans, Reformed, or United [Churches]. That was really the renewal of the Reformation; for Reformation is indeed the repentance of the church. The end of this repentance meant the end of the “Confessing Church.” What then followed was mere restoration. Every revolution ends with collapse and the convulsive efforts to restore everything to what it was before. That is an inborn propensity of natural man. From the far southern and eastern portion of the world, one has the impression that the Japanese people have been struck at the very core of their existence in a more profound way, and that there are more penitent men, men who have heard the New Testament summons to repentance, than among us Germans. One need simply glance at Lilje’s[1] “Sunday Paper” [Sonntagsblatt] or the propaganda paper broadcast throughout the world, “Christ and World” [Christ und Welt] with the following in mind: What remains here of the Stuttgart confession of guilt which was at least true in 1945?

Where the church, however, loses and surrenders the authority to preach repentance, neither can she preach justification. There she loses the Gospel. There she does not experience that repentance which makes the church the church of Christ. There she can still proclaim a Christian worldview; she can train scholars and workers, doctors and philosophers, engineers and journalists at evangelical academies. There her theologians can still proclaim a theory of the forgiveness of sins, but she no longer has the authority to call sinners to repentance. Karl Holl once made an excellent statement regarding the sermons of Schleiermacher from the years after the collapse of Prussia: “One gets the impression that Schleiermacher too perceived the deepening of the understanding of sin in the sense of strict Christianity at that time as a certain hindrance to the necessary ascendance of the father land” (Ges. Aufsatze [Umlaut over “a”] III, p. 357). That is Prussian Christianity, the Christianity of the “German Christians” and their kindred spirits in all nations of the earth: One reckons one’s own sins against those of others, and quickly forgets his own. But God forgets not. He forgives, but only the truly repentant.

Nowhere is the secularization of the Lutheran Church more visible than in the loss of her confessional conscience. In these letters we have often recounted that and why the Lutheran Church is a confessional church kat exochen [i.e. in the proper sense of the term]. The confession means for her more than it does for the Reformed, indeed, in many respect even more than for the [Roman] Catholics. The Reformed Churches can survive if the confession is relativized, when it is stated: “We do not know precisely whether next Sunday we will continue to interpret Scripture in the way we do today.” Catholicism actually celebrates a triumph when a dogma is proclaimed by the pope, the correctness of which is doubted by many of the best Catholics and which they then in worthy obedience accept, though they themselves know that the proof of tradition is defective and therefore doubtful. Both these groups [Reformed and Roman] lack that ultimate seriousness regarding the question of truth, which was the proprium [the essential point] of the Lutheran Reformation. We Lutherans are quite happy to boast about this virtue, but perhaps no longer with justification, just as the Swiss still boast of the bravery which their fathers showed on the battle fields of Europe centuries ago. Indeed, the church does not live on from the faith of the fathers. The confession can have a purely historical significance like the flags and uniforms of Hannover. If it is correct that the confessio, the confession of the faith, is indissolubly connected with confessio in the sense of the confession of sin and of the praise of God, is not then our lack of repentance and our lack of joyful praise of God in newer hymns a notable parallel to the regression of the dogmatic confession [of the faith]? Allow me to cite the following sentence from the Christmas letter of an American friend as an illustration of this state of affairs:
I am afraid we have come to a point in American Lutheranism where we no longer dare discuss controversial doctrines. There is a deep concern in all hearts for outward unity, but with that there often goes, as you know, doctrinal differences (read “indifference”) and even compromise on truth. The concern for truth has lost its power in our country, not least because of the philosophy of government and the corruption in government that we have seen for the last two decades. It reaches all the way down into the church because the young people are educated into this kind of a philosophy. God help us to be fearless in our presentation of the truth and in our battle against falsehood.[2]
Thus the great secularization process, which is today passing through all churches, affects in Lutheranism a troubling regression of confessional consciousness and with this also of dogmatic substance.
[1] Hans Lilje, bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Hanover, Council of the EKiD, leading bishop of the United Evangelical Lutheran Church in Germany or VELKD, president of the LWF 1952-1957. RGG3 IV.378. MH
Sunday, December 18, 2011
So do you think there was a problem with sermon length?
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Bach's Coffee Cantata
Schweigt stille, plaudert nicht (Be still, stop chattering) (aka The Coffee Cantata) (BWV 211) is a secular cantata written by Johann Sebastian Bachbetween 1732 and 1734. Although classified as a cantata, it is essentially a miniature comic opera.
In a satirical commentary, the cantata amusingly tells of an addiction to coffee, a pressing social problem in eighteenth century Leipzig, where this work was premiered.
The cantata's libretto (written by Christian Friedrich Henrici) features lines such as "If I can't drink my bowl of coffee three times daily, then in my torment, I will shrivel up like a piece of roast goat"—a sentiment that would likely have been appreciated by the patrons of Zimmerman's Coffee House in Leipzig, where Bach's Collegium Musicum, founded by Georg Philipp Telemann in 1702, would have originally performed the work.
Bach wrote no operas: the cantata was written for concert performance[1], but is frequently performed today fully staged with costumes.
Contents[hide] |
[edit]Roles
| Role | Voice type | Premiere Cast, 1734 |
|---|---|---|
| The Narrator | tenor | |
| Schlendrian, (literally Stick in the Mud) | baritone | |
| Lieschen, daughter of Schlendrian | soprano |
[edit]Movements
| Movement | Title | Characters | Synopsis |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Recitativo: Schweigt stille | Narrator | The narrator tells the audience to quiet down and pay attention, before introducing Schlendrian and Lieschen. |
| 2 | Aria: Hat man nicht mit seinen Kindern | Schlendrian | Schlendrian sings in disgust of how his daughter refuses to listen to him, even after telling her 1,000 times. |
| 3 | Recitativo: Du böses Kind | Schlendrian and Lieschen | Schlendrian asks his daughter again to stop drinking coffee, Lieschen defiantly tells her father to calm down. |
| 4 | Aria: Ei! Wie schmeckt der Kaffee süße | Lieschen | Lieschen sings a love song to her coffee |
| 5 | Recitativo: Wenn du mir nicht den Kaffee läßt | Schlendrian and Lieschen | Schlendrian starts giving ultimatums to his daughter, threatening to take away her meals, clothes, and other pleasures. Lieschen doesn't seem to care. |
| 6 | Aria: Mädchen, die von harten Sinnen | Schlendrian | In this sung monologue, Schlendrian tries to figure out what his daughter's weak spot is, so she absolutely couldn't want to drink coffee again. |
| 7 | Recitativo: Nun folge, was dein Vater spricht! | Schlendrian and Lieschen | Schlendrian threatens to prevent his daughter from marrying if she fails to give up coffee, Lieschen has a sudden change of heart. |
| 8 | Aria: Heute noch, lieber Vater | Lieschen | Lieschen thanks her father for offering to find her a husband, and vows to give up coffee if she can have a lover instead. |
| 9 | Recitativo: Nun geht und sucht der alte Schlendrian | Narrator | The narrator states that while Schlendrian goes out to find a husband for his daughter, Lieschen secretly tells potential suitors that they must let her drink her coffee if they care to marry her. |
| 10 | Trio: Die Katze läßt das Mausen nicht | Tutti | All three characters sing the moral of the story, "drinking coffee is natural". |

JS Bach's
Coffee Cantata
Libretto byChristian Friedrich Henrici
Cantata BMV211Composed for perfomance by Bach's Collegium at Zimmerman's Coffee House,
Leipzip, between 1732 & 1734
![]()
Recitative Narrator Be quiet, stop chattering, and pay attention to what's taking place: here comes Herr Schlendrian with his daughter Lieschen; he's growling like a honey bear. Hear for yourselves, what she has done to him! Aria Schlendrian Don't one's children cause one endless trials & tribulations! What I say each day to my daughter Lieschen falls on stony ground. Recitative Schlendrian You wicked child, you disobedient girl, oh! when will I get my way; give up coffee! Lieschen Father, don't be so severe! If I can't drink my bowl of coffee three times daily, then in my torment I will shrivel up like a piece of roast goat. Aria Lieschen Mm! how sweet the coffee tastes, more delicious than a thousand kisses, mellower than muscatel wine. Coffee, coffee I must have, and if someone wishes to give me a treat, ah, then pour me out some coffee! Recitative Schlendrian If you don't give up drinking coffee then you shan't go to any wedding feast, nor go out walking. oh! when will I get my way; give up coffee! Lieschen Oh well! Just leave me my coffee! Schlendrian Now I've got the little minx! I won't get you a whalebone skirt in the latest fashion. Lieschen I can easily live with that. Schlendrian You're not to stand at the window and watch people pass by! Lieschen That as well, only I beg of you, leave me my coffee! Schlendrian Furthermore, you shan't be getting any silver or gold ribbon for your bonnet from me! Lieschen Yes, yes! only leave me to my pleasure! Schlendrian You disobedient Lieschen you, so you go along with it all! Aria Schlendrian Hard-hearted girls are not so easily won over. Yet if one finds their weak spot, ah! then one comes away successful. Recitative Schlendrian Now take heed what your father says! Lieschen In everything but the coffee. Schlendrian Well then, you'll have to resign yourself to never taking a husband. Lieschen Oh yes! Father, a husband! Schlendrian I swear it won't happen. Lieschen Until I can forgo coffee? From now on, coffee, remain forever untouched! Father, listen, I won't drink any Schlendrian Then you shall have a husband at last! Aria Lieschen Today even dear father, see to it! Oh, a husband! Really, that suits me splendidly! If it could only happen soon that at last, before I go to bed, instead of coffee I were to get a proper lover! Recitative Narrator Old Schlendrian goes off to see if he can find a husband forthwith for his daughter Lieschen; but Leischen secretly lets it be known: no suitor is to come to my house unless he promises me, and it is also written into the marriage contract, that I will be permitted to make myself coffee whenever I want. Trio A cat won't stop from catching mice, and maidens remain faithful to their coffee. The mother holds her coffee dear, the grandmother drank it also, who can thus rebuke the daughters! |







