Wednesday, November 23, 2011

God's Word moves away due to THANKLESSNESS


God’s Word and Grace

Are a Passing Rain Shower - Synodical Sermon from 1930

By Friedrich Pfotenhauer

Translated by Matthew C. Harrison


“If we are honest about it, there are indications that in church matters we have all sorts of unrest and problems. These are warnings that the weather will change and change suddenly. Behind the clouds of grace, unthankfulness and disdain are beginning to blow. Oh, let us then earnestly tremble, heartily repent, and admonish one another; so as long as it is day, God’s Word and grace shall not become for us a passing rain shower that does not return.” Pfotenhauer, like Luther, was a prophet. The Great Depression, the Americanization of the Church, the movement toward Lutheran union, and growing internal struggles were all harbingers of difficult times ahead for the Synod. As a true prophet, Pfotenhauer called the Synod to repentance. The Synod increasingly struggled to deal with theological problems. The third generation abbreviated the theology of the second as it strived to be faithful. Others chafed at what they in part rightly perceived as ossification. Pfotenhauer’s sermon is directed as seriously to us, today. Great eras in the Church have always begun with the cry to repentance. M.H.



Therefore, as the Holy Spirit says,


“Today, if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion, on the day of testing in the wilderness, where your fathers put Me to the test and saw My works for forty years. Therefore I was provoked with that generation, and said, ‘They always go astray in their heart; they have not known My ways.’ As I swore in My wrath, ‘They shall not enter My rest.’”

Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God. But exhort one another every day, as long as it is called “today,” that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin. For we have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end. As it is said, “Today, if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion.” For who were those who heard and yet rebelled? Was it not all those who left Egypt led by Moses? And with whom was He provoked for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? And to whom did He swear that they would not enter His rest, but to those who were disobedient? So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief. Hebrews 3:7–19


Honorable and beloved fathers and brothers in the Lord! Dear friends on all sides! In this year, our Church celebrates the four-hundredth anniversary of the Presentation of the Augsburg Confession. In it, the fathers of our Church clearly and plainly set forth their Confession and gladly proclaimed it on that memorable 25th of June, 1530, before the great men of this world. The Augsburg Confession is a bright morning star— indeed, a sun—in which the grace of God in Christ Jesus, as it is revealed in the Holy Scriptures, brightly shines upon the thousands who cast their glance toward it. And it warms them with its bright rays. It became a banner around which those who love the divine Word of God were gathered. It was the vessel in which the blessings of the Reformation would be preserved for later generations. We members of the Missouri Synod are also richly blessed by this glorious Confession of our Church, and we walk in its light. It is therefore appropriate and right that this year we consider the great events at Augsburg because they are joyous and good things.



But the remembrance of the great grace that God allowed our Church to experience again also has a serious side. I hope, dear brothers, that you will not think it wrong or regard it as a sour note in this jubilee celebration if I set forth this serious matter in my sermon. When a rich period of grace had broken out over Germany, Luther, in his writing “To the Councilmen of All Cities of the German Nation, That They Establish and Maintain Christian Schools,”1 made the terrifying statement in 1524: “God’s Word and grace is a passing rain shower which does not return where it once was.” Let us now treat this word of the reformer in the light of the text read in the fear of God. Thus the theme of my sermon is:


God’s Word and grace is a passing rain shower which does not return where it once was.

I will demonstrate for you the truth of this statement, the cause of this fact, and make the application to us.


I.


Our text points to an absolutely terrible event in the history of the Jewish people. The Lord had visited them with His grace, and with outstretched arm He brought them out of slavery in Egypt and into the Promised Land. It was a great and blessed time. God did signs and wonders for His people and spoke with them in a friendly way as a father speaks with His children. But, oh, his glorious relationship did not last long! A short time after rescuing them from Egypt, God swore to the entire congregation: “You shall not come into my rest” (Hebrews 3:11; Numbers 14:22, 23, 29, 35; Psalm 95:11). Salvation was not irretrievably lost. Instead of proceeding into Canaan, the entire nation, except Joshua and Caleb, was struck down in the wilderness. God’s Word and grace had become for them a passing rain shower which did not return. The Letter to the Hebrews places this terrifying example of punishment before our eyes for warning. We must not think that the experience in the wilderness was exceptional. No. As the history of the Church teaches, it has continued to be repeated.


It was a time of great visitation of grace upon the Jewish people when the Lord appeared in their midst and administered His prophetic office among them. His words were like early and late rains that quicken the thirsty land. The saving grace of God had appeared to them. The friendliness and gentleness of God, our Savior, personally walked among them. But at the conclusion of His work of teaching, the Lord had to declare to the people that the time of grace had run its course and would not return. And so it happened. For two thousand years, heaven has been closed and covered for the Jewish people as such. It happened to them: God’s Word and grace is a passing rain shower which does not return where it once has been.

In the time of the apostles and in the post-apostolic period, the East along with the bordering countries was richly visited by God’s grace. The hastening feet of the apostle Paul founded blooming congregations in Asia Minor and Greece. The apostle John worked into old age at Ephesus. In Egypt and North Africa, God gave mild rains, so that the congregations grew and gloriously expanded. But behold, around the year 622, the lying prophet Mohammed arose. He and his followers spread their false teaching with fire and sword. The East, Greece, Egypt, and North Africa were their booty. The cross vanished, and the crescent took its place. The lands that once bloomed, in which the apostle worked, where the great Church fathers Athanasius and Augustine had taught, became barren and void and have remained so now for twelve hundred years. They have experienced it: God’s Word and grace is a passing rain shower which does not return where it has once been.



In Luther, God sent to the world a great prophet. He proclaimed, as no one since the apostles, the free grace of God in Christ Jesus. That of which the prophet Isaiah spoke happened: “Shower, O heavens from above, and let the skies rain down righteousness; let the earth open, that salvation may sprout forth, and let it cause righteousness to spring up also; I, the Lord, have created it” (Isaiah 45:8 RSV). The gracious weather ruled a broad area; indeed, Germany and the Nordic lands at once. And rain showers brought fruit at that time also over England, France, Italy, and other countries. But how is it going today, particularly in Germany? The Lutheran Church there is like a little building in a vineyard, a night hut in a pumpkin garden (Isaiah 1:8).2 What Luther had prophesied to his Germans has been fulfilled: “You should know that God’s Word and grace is like a passing rain shower which does not return where it once has been. It happened to the Jews. But it’s gone, and they have nothing. Paul brought it to Greece. Now it’s gone and they have the Turks. Rome and Latin lands also had it. Now it’s gone and they have the pope. And you Germans must not think that you will have it forever. For the unthankfulness and despising of it will not allow it to remain.”


II.


This leads us now to the second part of our treatment, in which we will consider why it is a fact that God’s Word and grace is a passing rain shower which does not return where it once has been. The cause lies not in the Word of God and grace. Word and grace are not such that they desire to greet us only briefly, then lift up and rush off, never to return again. The grace of God in Christ Jesus was prepared for all men. God sent His Son for the redemption of the whole world. The Son shed His blood for a propitiation for all, and the Holy Spirit wants all to enter into the kingdom of grace. Therefore God sends His messengers out to invite them in. And oh, how happily He would like to come to all and remain with all, quicken them with His Word and His grace, and make them happy for time and for eternity! How He is pained and laments when His Word falls upon hard soil, and how He rejoices when hearts are opened to Him, so that He can shower upon them His gracious rain!



Our text shows us why God’s Word is a passing rain shower which does not return to where it has once been. There it says of the Jews: “Today, if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion, on the day of testing in the wilderness, where your fathers put Me to the test and saw My works for forty years. Therefore I was provoked with that generation, and said, ‘They always go astray in their heart; they have not known My ways.’ As I swore in My wrath, ‘They shall not enter My rest’” (Hebrews 3:7–11).

“For who were those who heard and yet rebelled? Was it not all those who left Egypt led by Moses? And with whom was He provoked for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? And to whom did He swear that they would not enter His rest, but to those who were disobedient? So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief” (vv. 16–19).



In this text we hear the cause why Israel could not enter into the Promised Land. Their lack of faith took from them the grace of God, and their lack of faith prevented the grace of God from returning to them. They had all seen the great signs and wonders. But instead of trusting in God like children, they grumbled constantly against Him and did not believe His promises. And so God swore in His wrath: “You shall not enter My rest.”



And, dear brothers, faithlessness, unthankfulness, and disdain are always the cause when God’s Word and grace is a passing rain shower which does not return to where it once was. Unthankfulness and disdain are the winds behind the clouds of divine grace. The winds disturb these clouds, set them in motion, and they up and flee away. Faithlessness and disdain are the reason God’s Word and grace do not return. Faithlessness and disdain, after they have driven away the grace of God, now breathe their hot breath against the diligence that had engendered the Word of God. That destroyed, the field once green and blooming now becomes deserted and desolate.



Unthankfulness and disdain were the cause that Jerusalem lost the grace of God. The farewell speech of our Savior to the city was this: “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who killed the prophets and stoned them who were sent to you, how often would I have gathered together your children, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings; and you would not! Behold, your house shall be left desolate for you” (Matthew 23:37–38 RSV). Unthankful- ness and disdain were the cause that the Eastern Church did not retain God’s Word and grace. Unbelief, unthankfulness, and disdain have not allowed the rain and the gracious weather to remain in Germany.


III.


Now we will make the necessary application from what we have heard to ourselves. We, dear hearers, have had in our Synod God’s Word and grace for a long time. For over eighty years it has been proclaimed purely and clearly in our churches and schools. God has rained upon us streams of love. Precisely the celebration of the Augsburg Confes- sion reminds us that the Lord with outstretched arms led us out of the servitude of the pa- pacy through Luther. We must not become secure. Hear the warning that our text directs to us: “Take care, brothers, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God. But exhort one another every day, as long as it is called ‘today,’ that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin. For we share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original confidence firm to the end. As it is said, ‘Today, if you hear His voice, do not harden your hearts as in the rebellion’” (Hebrews 3:12–15).



If we are honest about it, there are indications that in church matters we have all sorts of unrest and problems. These are warnings that the weather will change and change sud- denly. Behind the clouds of grace, unthankfulness and disdain are beginning to blow. Oh, let us then earnestly tremble, heartily repent, and admonish one another; so as long as it is day, God’s Word and grace shall not become for us a passing rain shower which does not return. Let us buy, because the market is gathered at the gate of the city. The sun is shining and the weather is good. Let us make use of God’s grace and Word because we have them! Let us grab hold of them and keep them!



To be sure, when we look to the evil times in which we live, to the rising level of in- difference in our congregations, to the history of previous generations, so must we break down and be overcome with great fear, like a man before battle. And certainly we should completely forsake ourselves and our ability, but not the Lord and His grace. The Lord will not leave us but remain with us. He wills not that we perish, but that we enter into rest. For this very reason He provides us a warning and example of punishment, so that we avoid thanklessness and disdain and diligently make use of His Word and His grace. The celebration of the Presentation of the Augsburg Confession reminds us anew of the great treasure sent by the Lord of our Church! May this celebration move us to make use of this valuable treasure with thanksgiving, and may it also move us ardently to implore God that He would preserve this treasure for us and our children.

Oh, stay with us, Lord Jesus Christ, For evening is now upon us; Thy divine Word, that glorious light, Let it burn among us bright!


At Home in the House of My Fathers



Translated from “Gottes Word und Gnade ein fahrender Platzregen, Synodalpredigt, gehalten im Jahre 1930,” in Predigten gehalten zu verschiedenen Zeiten und bei verschiedenen Glegenheiten Auf mehrfaches Verlangen im Druck dargeboten von F. Pfotenhauer (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1938). —M. H.

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Bill Withers - Ain't no Sunshine When She's Gone

Caught a Moose!

Pogo Moose Incident -- Bracebridge, Ontario, Canada -- 1 hr. 45min. North of Toronto


They were laying new power cables which were strung on the ground for miles. The moose are rutting right now and very agitated.


This one was thrashing around and got his antlers stuck in the cables. When the men (miles away) began pulling the lines up with their big equipment, the moose went up with them.


The workers noticed excess tension in the lines and went searching for the problem. He was still alive when they lowered him to the ground. He was a huge 60 inch bull and slightly teed off...

This guy was so bad off, I had to let him go ahead of me at Starbucks.

Out of COFFEE???!!!

Near Defenestration

Reformation Banjo! Thanks again for this Rob!

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Luther's Legacy to Christianity.

This essay first appeared in the Jahrbuch des Martin Luther Bundes, 1946, pp. 38-42. It was written for the 400th anniversary of the Reformer’s death. The essay was republished in Lutherische Blätter, vol. 19, no. 90 (August 1967). I translated it for The Lonely Way (CPH).

Pastor H.

In the early morning hours of the 18th of February, 1546, on a cold winter’s night in Eisleben, Martin Luther closed his eyes for ever. “I won’t live to see Easter” he had said on his sixty-third birthday. Concerned for his life, his friends and relatives saw him undertake, toward the end of January, the last journey of his life. Accompanied by his sons and Justus Jonas, he traveled to the city of his birth where he was to mediate a quarrel between the brothers who were the Counts of Mansfeld. The letters which he wrote to his “gracious dear lady of the house” during this journey, are the most stirringly human testimony to his mature, and yet childlike faith. “I fear that were you to cease your concern, the earth might finally swallow us up and destroy everything. Are you also studying the Catechism and the Creed? Pray and let God worry. For you and I are not commanded to worry for me or you. It says: ‘Cast your anxiety upon Him, for He cares for you’, Ps. 55 and many other texts.” He wrote this on the 10th of February. Four days later he preached his last sermon. On the 16th and 17th the agreement between the counts was signed and his task of peace-making was finished. Luther no longer took part in the negotiations on the last day and remained in his room. Toward evening he complained of chest pains, which then passed and returned and worsened. Toward 10:00 in the evening, after he had rested, he went to his bedroom. He took leave of his company with the words, “Pray for our Lord God and His Gospel, that things go well with Him. For the Council at Trent and the miserable Pope have a terrible grudge against Him.” Toward 1:00 am he awoke short of breath and raised his voice: “Oh, Lord God, I’m in so much pain! Oh, dear Doctor Jonas, it appears as though I shall remain here.” He still had been able to proceed to his room, and there began his last brief hour. In the presence of his son, his friends and a doctor who had been hastily summoned, at a moment of pause in his struggle with death, he spoke his last prayers, recited to himself Bible passages such as John 3:16, and Psalm 68:21, and answered the question put by Justus Jonas: “Reverend father, will you remain steadfast in Christ and the doctrine which you have preached?” He responded with an audible “Yes!” Then his soul passed into the peace of God. But in Eisleben, in the villages and cities through which his remains were carried, and especially in Wittenberg, at this burial in the Castle Church, and the funeral celebration of the University, there was a mourning which was more than the mourning of a people over the loss of one of its great men. Indeed, the man who died while the pope convened in Trent the council for the “eradication of heresy”, that is, for the elimination of the Lutheran Reformation, and while the Emperor mobilized the forces of a world power for war against the Evangelical estates, was more than a great German. He was more than a faithful guardian of the souls of his people, a man of whom one gets the impression that through his powerful prayers had averted the catastrophe which for many years had been sweeping toward Germany. As the rediscoverer of the Gospel of the grace of God, he was the Reformer of the Church, and not only the church of one land, rather the entire, the one church of God on earth.

Only he has understood Luther, who understands him as the Reformer of the Church. The legacy which Luther left behind can be properly grasped only by one who realizes that this legacy applies to all of Christendom on earth. For if Luther – as he himself thought and the Evangelical church believes – with his discovery of the saving truth of the justification of the sinner through faith alone, did nothing other than bring the holy gospel to light again, then his discovery has a significance as universal as the Gospel itself. He had expressed this his message one last time in the last lines which we have by his hand, written on a piece of paper on the 16th of February, and found after his death. This last note, written in Latin, speaks of the unfathomable depth of the Bible: “No one can understand Vergil in his Bucolics orGeorgics unless he has been a shepherd or farmer for five years. No one can understand Cicero in his letters unless he has served in a significant position in government for 20 years. No one can apprehend the Holy Scriptures unless he has governed a congregation for a 100 years with the Prophets.” The note concludes with the sentence: “We are beggars: This is true.” The words “We are beggars” are written in German for emphasis.

It is as though Luther wanted to say what he had to say one last time; for all, for his contemporaries, those who came after him, for Christianity of all times. “We are beggars! This is true!” This is the fundamental melody which rang out throughout his entire life, doctrine and work. They ring powerfully already in the first words of his lectures on Romans of 1513, where he notes that it is the intent of this letter “to destroy, root-out, and bring to naught all wisdom and righteousness of the flesh, and this to fortify and make sin great.” It rings through the hymns of the Reformation: “Even in the best of lives, our deeds are naught”, “With our might nothing is done.” It resounds in all the work of the Reformer, to the last great controversial writings in which he defends the gospel against its falsification by pope and council. There is only one of the great teachers of the church who possessed the knowledge of human misery, the impotence of man in all spiritual matters, who can be compared to Luther. That is Augustin, the greatest of the church fathers of the old Latin church. He so emphasized the sola gratia, “by grace alone” in a time of the migration of nations to the Christianity of the west, that it could never completely forget it. Still today his mighty praise of the redeeming divine grace rings in the Roman Catholic liturgy when in one of the prayers, which is read by the priest in every mass, God is called upon as the “One who does not regard merit, but sends forgiveness.” Or when in the burial office is sung in the dies irae, “King of fearful majesty, you who deliver freely [umsonst] those who shall be delivered” and implores the Lord Christ:

“You who once absolved Mary
and pardoned the thief,
have granted hope also to me.”

This sola gratia, as it rings yet even in the Roman Church – if only as one note among others – must not be undervalued. As Evangelical [Lutheran] Christians we can only rejoice. This is for us today what it once was for the Reformer, Martin Luther: A promising sign that the church of God is also still present in Roman Christianity. Otherwise how could the Reformation have commenced from a cell in a monastery?

But Luther’s understanding goes deeper. He knew that the sola gratiamust be enlarged by the sola fide, that to the “by grace alone” must be added “through faith alone.” For the depth of divine grace is understood only when one knows “Even in the best of lives, our deeds are naught.” Also in a life led in the peace of the forgiveness of God and in the power of His Holy Spirit, we are never righteous by what we are and do, rather always only through that which Christ is and what He as done for us. When the Apostle, with the deep experience of the effect of the Holy Spirit, describes a life of sanctification in Galatians 2:20, with the words: “I live, and yet not I, rather Christ lives in me,” he then continues with, “The life I now live in the flesh, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.” Our righteousness before God is never a righteousness which we possess, rather it is, in the proper sense of the word, the righteousness of Christ. What the old Reformation hymn says, which the young Zinzendorf revitalized in his own way, is literally true:

Jesus Thy blood and righteousness
My beauty are, my glorious dress
With it before God shall I stand,
When I heaven shall enter in.

Here the sola fide is so clearly and simply expressed that a child can understand it. If a Francis of Assisi, a Friedrich von Bodelschwingh, or whoever else one might name as an example of a sanctified life, were saved, then it was not because of their life or work, rather only for this reason: Because the Lord Christ also died for these poor sinners. “By faith alone”, that is “I am nothing, I have nothing, I am capable of nothing; but I have a Savior who is all, has all, and can do all.” God has made Him for us “Wisdom, righteousness, sanctification and redemption” (I Cor. 1:31). And what Luther wrote in 1516 to his brother in the order, Goerg Spenlein, cries out through his words, “We are beggars: This is true”, his last written note, to all of Christianity, as his legacy to every Christian: “Father, my dear brother, learn of Christ, even Christ the Crucified! Learn to sing His praise and despairing of yourself, say to Him: You Lord Jesus, are my righteousness, but I am your sin. You have taken what was in me, and have given to me what I was not.” And then comes this bold assertion: “Be careful never to endeavor to obtain such purity, that you no longer find yourself a sinner, much less desire to be one. Christ dwells only among sinners. This is why he descended from heaven, when He dwelt among the righteous, so also to make His dwelling among sinners. Take note of this His love time and again and you will experience the sweetest consolation… And so only in Him, through having despaired of yourself and your works, will you find peace. Here you will learn from Christ Himself, that He, as He has received you unto Himself, has made your sins His own, and His righteousness your righteousness.”

Here we see Luther’s understanding of man in its profound correspondence with his understanding of Christ. Luther completely understood the pitiful condition of man, the sin which is “such a profound evil corruption of human nature,” “that reason cannot understand it, but it must be believed on the basis of holy Scripture.” That we are sinners “Even in the best of lives”, and that the “best” Christ is perceived in the daily and rich forgiveness of sins, this human reason cannot grasp, and it will not accept it for true when it hears it spoken. Original sin can be compared to one of those mental illnesses, a sign of which is that the sick person can no longer recognize his illness, and believes he is entirely healthy. Luther understood the profundity of sin because he allowed himself to be instructed on the nature of man, not from the philosophical books, as the medieval man learned from the works of Aristotle, but from the Word of God alone. And for this reason he was also able to understand the office and work of Jesus Christ as no teacher of the church before him. “Christ can not enter into living communion with a sinner.” Thus the German edition of St. Thomas Aquinas (vol. 30, p. 528) interprets the statement of Thomas Aquinas, that the man in the condition of mortal sin can not be united with Christ and thus must not receive the Sacrament of the Altar (Summa Theol. III, 79.3). Luther asserted the very opposite: “Christ dwells only with sinners.” For the sinner and for the sinner alone is His table set. There we receive His true body and His true blood “for the forgiveness of sins” and this holds true even if forgiveness has already been received in Absolution. That here Scripture is completely on the side of Luther needs no further demonstration. Every page of the New Testament is indeed testimony of the Christ whose proper office it is “to save sinners”, “to seek and to save the lost”. And the entire saving work of Jesus, from the days when He was in Galilee and, to the amazement and alarm of the Pharisees, ate with tax collectors and sinners; to the moment when he, in contradiction with the principles of every rational morality, promised paradise to the thief on the cross, yes, His entire life on earth, from the cradle to the cross, is one, unique grand demonstration of a wonder beyond all reason: The miracle of divine forgiveness, of the justification of the sinner. “Christ dwells only in sinners.”

“We are beggars: This is true.” In these words, the last which Martin Luther’s tireless pen wrote for us, lies his legacy to Christianity. The most profound understanding of man as sinner and the profound understanding of Christ as the Savior of sinners is bound up in this statement. “That man is nothing and that he learn to forsake himself and to hope in Christ” to this the Reformer yet today calls Christendom, and indeed, all Christendom. For the saving message of the justification of the sinner alone by grace belongs – precisely because it is nothing other than the proper understanding of the gospel – to all of God’s church. Yes, the one church of God, which on earth exists in, with and under the various confessional churches of Christendom, lives from the gospel so understood. For the pure maintenance of the message of the Reformation is not a work of confessional narrowness, rather a service for the unity of the church, as Luther once expressed it, when he said of the article of justification by faith, “Where this article remains pure, Christendom also remains pure and united, without separation. But where it does not remain, there it is not possible to avoid any error or sectarian spirit.” It is for this service that the Evangelical Lutheran Church today is called to fulfill in the world in a special way. It is still nothing other than that portion of Christendom to which the cry of the Reformation belonged and to which the Lord of the church had given the task to raise this cry again. Can we do this? Is the gospel of the justification of the sinner by grace alone still the bread from which we live? Is it still the heart and soul of our preaching? Do we still know – or once again realize! – what sin is, how serious the judgment of God is, and what a fearful thing it is to fall into the hands of the living God? Do we still know the full consolation of faith in the Savior of sinners, in the way Luther’s explanation of the second article shows Him to us? Do we know what it means that this Christ is actually present in the Word of His Gospel and in His Sacrament, as near to as he was when He walked the earth, yes nearer than when He ate with tax collectors and sinners? If we still know all of this, if we still believe it, is it a living possession or has it become a mere tradition? Have they become words without content? These are the questions which the Reformer poses for us who confess the faith of the Evangelical Lutheran Church, both in Germany and in the entire world. “We are beggars: This is true!” So must we answer with shame and remorse. But immeasurably rich in grace is He who is the Savior of all sinners and whom the New Testament once called “The Savior of His body” (Ephesians 5:23), the Redeemer of His church. And inexhaustible are the riches of His means of grace, the Gospel in Sermon and Absolution, Holy Baptism and the Holy Supper… inexhaustible for all beggars.

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Sasse: "The dying of the confessional church began in the Reformed Churches."


The dying of the confressional church began in the Reformed Churches. In an opinion concerning the “desireability and possibility of a general Reformed confession of faith for the Alliance of the Reformed churches holding the Presbyterian system” Karl Barth in Cardiff (1925) defined a Reformed confession of faith as “the statement of the insight granted provisionally to the universlal christian Church concering the relation of God to Christ Jesus, witnessed only in the Holy Scriptures, formulated spontaneously and publicly by a locally circumscribed Christian fellowship, decisive for the present for its character toward the ouside and directive for the present for its own teaching and living.” (Gesammelte vortraege, Bd. II, 1928, p. 76; emphasis ours).


What this definition has in common with the Lutheran understainding of the Confessions is

the disignation of its contents as an interpretation which is correct and has therefore been given to the whole Church. What distinquishes both is the stronger emphasis placed on the normative significance of the Confessions among Lutherans over against the “pious relativism” (ibid. p. 79, 83), which expresses iself in the terms “locally circumscribed,” “for the present,” “temporarily.”


Add ImageIt is actually true that the Reformed Church knows no common confession, but that the Augsburg Confession, which unites the Lutheran Church, faces a multitude of Reformed confessions, the Helvetica, the Gallicana, the Belgica, the Scotica, the Anglican Articles, etc. Also confessions which thereafter not only achieved local standing, as, e.g., the Heidelberg Catechism and the Westminster Confession, never where adopted by all Reformed Churches.


Now of course no objection can be raised if a locally circumscribed church, be it a regional or

state church, confesses its faith. On the contrary, it must do that.The only question is, why the same faith should not be confessed by all in the same words, as we do in the ancient creeds of the church. Isn’t there perhaps a connection between the localizing of the confession of faith and “for the present,” between the renunciation of local ecumenicity and the renunciation of temporal ecumenicity? It is essential for the Lutheran confessions that they wish to give expression to the truth which unites the entire orthodox church of all times and places, the believers presently living with the brethren in the whole world: with the fathers since the beginning and with those who will confess the true faith unto the end of the world. That, then, leads to this that the confessor

confesses the faith in which he wants to persevere and with which he wishes to step before the judgment seat of God.


Barth and the whole Reformed church of today assures us that this is hybris, that we are seeking an unattainable safeguard and thereby actually destroying the character of the Scriptures as the only norm. We intend still to enter upon the relation of the Scriptures and the Confessions, of the norma normans (the guiding principle) and the norma normata (the guided principle). At this point we should like, first of all, to call attention to the fact that confessions existed also in the old Reformed Church, to which the relativism of “for the present” was still foreign, e.g., the Confession of the Church of Scotland of 1560 which was rightly valued so highly; edited, and commented upon by Karl Barth. Here as in the Lutheran Confessions from Luther’s Confession of 1528 (Vom Abendmahl Christi, Bekenntnis, WA 26,490; [LW 37.161-372; Aland no. 2]) to the conclusion of the Formula of Concord, one finds the same view of judgement and the resolve to abide by this confession. The Preamble of the Confessio Scotica concludes with a reference to the judgment

which according to Matthew 10:33 is to descend upon the deniers of the truth of the Gospel, after which these words follow: “Therefore it is our definite resolve, through the mighty Spirit of this our Lord Jesus Christ, to abide in the confession of this our faith as it is is expressed in the following articles” (quoted form Barth’s Gifford lectures of 1938, “Gotteserkenntnis und Gottesdienst nach reformatorischer Lehre,” Zollikon, 1938, p. 11; the Preamble is missing in the edition of the Reformed Confessions by E.F.K. Mueller). With respect to the readiness to permit themselves to be corrected by the Word of God, there is therefore no difference between the Old Reformed and the Lutheran view of the Confessions.


The “certain pious and free relativism” which according to Karl Barth is suited to the Reformed Confession, was doubtless prepared in the sixteenth century. But it achieved its triumphonly gradually in the latitudinarianism[1] of the Anglicans, in the independent Puritanism and in the syncretistic movements of the seventeenth century (“syncretism” is the term commonly used in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries for what is later called “union” and “unionism”). At this place we would mention only the second of these phenomena, which has become of immeasurable importance for modern Protestantism in Europe (through Pietism) and America.


In his famous farewell sermon preached to the Pilgrim Fathers who were leaving Leyden for America, J.P. Robinson[2] said: “The Lord will let still additional truths burst forth from His holy Word. I cannot sufficiently express my regret over the Reformed churches which have arrived at a frontier in religion and are not new willing to go forward, as the instruments of the Reformation. – Luther and Calvin were great shining lights in their days, but they did not penetrate the whole counsel of God.” And he even hazarded this statement: “All pious people, though they are themselves outside the true visible church, are by faith members of the mystical body of Jesus Christ – common reason as well as Holy Scriptures teaches that.” In these words, by the way, the future church history of America is prophesied.


What are the confessions to these Congregationalists? Since the Local congregation, which assembles here and now for he worship of God, is the Church of Christ, its confession can actually be only a local one. There can be no confession which binds all Christendom. Within a year the local congregation [has changed and] is not the same as it is today. Consequently its confession can only be a provisional one. How can I say that a congregation whose composition (membership), as we know is continually changing, will abide by one particular confession? Yes, how can I myself say with Luther and all the confessors of the church that I desire to step before the judgement seat of God with this my confession? I can do that only, and a congregation can do that only, on the basis of the firm conviction that this confession teaches nothing else than the truth of the Word of God. Also the Pilgrim Fathers of 1620 knew that. But they were told that the churches of the Reformation had stood still; that God would still let new truths burst forth from his Word; that to say the least, a completion of the Reformation by means of a new Reformation, the completion of the old confession by means of new confessions was necessary. And who would find these new truths, formulate these new confessions? That would be done by the individual local congregation out of the hic et nunc (the here and now) of its confessional situation. A host of new confessions would thus come into existence.


And that has actually been the case. Karl Barth himself points out that the same renewal movement of the nineteenth century, which in Lutheranism led to the revivial of the Book of Concord resulted in the drafting of ever so many new confessions in the orthdox free churches in the Reformed area (Gesammelte Vortraege, Bd. II, p. 80). The pressure for new confessions, the emergence of new confessional forms for a more or less limited area, which we observe in modern Lutheranism, is a criterion of the Calvinizing process through which our churches are passing, all the more since this movement goes hand in hand with a growing lack of understanding of the old confessions of the Lutheran Reformation and of the meaning of the confessional pledge in our Church.


Here, with respect to our confessional pledge, opinions are divided even as the churches themselves part company at this point. Here it also becomes clear why the Reformed Churches have not been able to preserve their Confessions. The “pious relativism” of the Reformed Confession finds expression in the quatenus (the “insofar as”) of the doctrinal pledge. Whereas the Lutheran pastor assumes the responsibility of teaching according to the Confessions “because” (quia) they are in harmony with the Holy Scriptures, the Reformed pastor does this only “insofar as” (quatenus) it is Scriptural, and because he regards the Lutheran pledge with the quia as presumption, yea, as an elevation of the Confessions above the Holy Scriptures.[3]


What shall we say to this? First, that the properly understood quatenus (“insofar as”) is self-evidnet for every church which appeals to the Reformation, since no church wants to teach anything which is not Scripture doctrine. It is so self-evident that one does not need to articulate it. Men can and must accept also the Talmud or the Tridentimum [creed of the Roman Catholic Council of Trent] quatenus, “insofar as,” they interpret Scriptures correctly. The quatenus pledge is really no pledge at all. Secondly, the question which comes into consideration in connection with the confessional pledge is simply and solely the question whether the Confessions are Scriptural, whether they are the substance of the Holy Scriptures, as the Formula of Concord expresses it. Only if I am unshakably convinced and that on the basis of most earnest searching in the Scriptures, can I accept it and promise that “I will neither privately nor publicly speak or write anything contrary to it, but by the elp of God’s grace intend to abide thereby” (Conclusion of the Solid Declaration).


Hermann Sasse, Letters to Lutheran Pastors 43, 1956


[1] Term applied in the 17th century to a group of Anglican divines who, while continuing to conform with the Church of England, attached relatively little importance to matters of dogmatic truth, ecclesiastical organization, and liturgical practice. In general the sympathies of Latitudinarian divines lay with the Arminian theology. Their views did much to prepare the way for the religious temper of England in the 18th century. ODCC p. 956. MH

[2] John Robinson ca. 1575-1625, pastor to the Pilgrim Fathers. Little is known about his early life. Probably studied at Cambridge. Ordained in the Church of England. Later became a Puritan. In 1608 due to the extreme measures against non-conformity, he and his congregation fled to the Netherlands. Settled in Leiden and from 1617 interested himself in the Leiden community’s desire to emigrate to America. Prevented from joining them on the Mayflower, he assisted in their preparation. ODCC p. 1403. MH

[3] See Sasse’s “Quatenus or Quia?” in The Lonely Way I. Originally published in AELKZ 71.7 (18 Feb. 1938) pp. 152-154; Feuerhahn no. 201. MH

Sunday, November 6, 2011

The LCMS has far more people in the pew each Sunday than all of Lutheran Germany


Found these states for 2006 on the Evangelical Church in Germany (EKD). "Around one million persons attend a Protestant worship every Sunday in Germany." The LCMS has 2.3 million members and some 38% are in church on a given Sunday. That means 874,000 LCMS Lutherans are in church every week. There are 30,000,000 members of the EKD. The EKD consists of 22 churches. The United Evangelical Lutheran Church (VELKD) lists 8 member churches which also are part of the EKD. The EKD churches include Lutheran, Reformed and United Churches. All are in church fellowship.

Not only does the Missouri Synod have nearly as many people in church on a Sunday as all Protestant Germany, it easily has far more Christians in its pews each week than all the German Lutheran Churches combined.

M.H.

EKD Regional Churches


Services of Worship and Holy Communion 2006

"For where two or three are gathered in my name, I am there among them." (Matthew 18:20)

Participation in congregational worship is the quintessential expression of Christian piety. In the course of a year, nearly one million main worship services and around 300,000 Sunday school services are held in Germany on Sundays and principal festivals. This represents the sizable figure of 21,000 worships per Sunday and principal festival. Added to this are 41,000 Christmas Eve afternoon and evening services, and numerous New Year's services and weekday worships as well as devotions for special occasions (e.g. school, Advent, Lenten worships and devotions) in addition to regular weekly and monthly events.

Worships devoted to specific target groups or incorporating special elements constitute an alternative to "normal" Sunday morning worships. The possibility for the entire family to attend worship together is very popular among parents with children, who otherwise would seldom go to church. In West German member churches, the number of family worships between 1987 and 2005 rose from 39,000 to 57,000. They also have become a common feature in congregational life in member churches in the eastern part of Germany, where nine percent of Sunday worships are attended jointly by children and their parents.

Around one million persons attend a Protestant worship every Sunday in Germany. An additional approximately one million Christians follow the Sunday worship broadcast on television.

Sunday and principal festival worships, total1,264,307
Number of Sunday schools (children's worships)285,448
Family worships77,325



First Sunday in Lent
Worships, total 25,551
Attendance 941,359
As a percentage of church membership 3.7%
Number of main worships 16,874
Attendance 786,654
Number of Sunday schools (children's worships) 8,677
Attendance 154,705

On special occasions, for example, Thanksgiving Sunday, church attendance doubles and, on Christmas Eve, churchgoers must reckon with inconveniences and long waiting times in order to be able to take part in worship and this trend is continually increasing. Over nine million persons including many non-church members attend church on Christmas Eve. Especially in eastern German member churches, where statistically over 60 percent of church members attend a Christmas Eve service, there are many non-Christians among those who attend the afternoon service. Over all, an estimated 70 million worship visits take place annually. This figure does not include attendance at baptisms and weddings occurring outside a congregational worship. Persons who gather to celebrate worship for special personal reasons are also not included.


Good Friday
Worships 20,379
Attendance 1,177,153
As a percentage of church membership 4.6%

Thanksgiving Sunday
Worships 20,484
Attendance 2,070,132
As a percentage of church membership 8.2%



First Sunday of Advent
Worships 16,72
Attendance 1,315,504
As a percentage of church membership 5.2%

Christmas Eve
Worships 41,373
Attendance 9,589,019
As a percentage of church membership 37.8%


A special expression of the spiritual life of congregations is the celebration of Holy Communion. Practice in this regard is changing within some regional churches and congregations, both in terms of form and of children's participation. In many congregations, the sacrament is given at every Sunday worship, in others, once a month. The 258,000 Holy Communion celebrations draw more than 10 million believers. Added to this are 33,000 home celebrations and for the sick, which take place in a smaller context and involve an average of five participants.

Holy Communion
Holy Communion celebrations, total 290,937
Holy Communion worships 257,610
At home or for the sick 33,327
Persons receiving Holy Communion 10,677,900
Holy Communion during worship services 10,525,362
At home or as part of Holy Communion celebrations for the sick 152,548